song of the week: hotel california
monkey of the week: ring-tailed lemur
too-cutely-named sports personality of the week: peekaboo street
candy of the week: pixie stix
patron saint of the week: St. Barbara, patron saint against mine collapse (i wish i was kidding...)
my attempt to be clever of the week: don't walk away, i lean.
guy who, despite being the best at what he does, you've never heard of, of the week: Alain Trudel (if only he played professional sports, you'd probably have 2 pairs of his shoes in your closet right now...)
my top-ten list of the week:
top ten names for groups of things that don't have names
10. a fugue of vagrants
9. a turbulance of midgets
8. a bracket of termites
7. a mullet of commercials
6. a travesty of balloon animals
5. a convolusion of sofas
4. a melody of engineers
3. a sacrilage of lint
2.an enigma of nickels
1. a conniption of shoes
so, on a serious note...
i've been thinking and reading the bible at the same time, which i know is reckless behaviour, since mindless faith and ignorant adherance to the ways we've created, manipulated, and represented God would probably allow me to fit in a little better.
such is life.
this morning, for instance, i was thinking about this verse... it's in romans, 9:19-21
One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?” 20But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’ ”[h] 21Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?
that's fine. i'm cool with being whatever God makes me. but that also means that we're absolved. it means that if one person is designed as a flower pot, he gains no glory at the end for the lovely smell that he has upon his arrival at the gate. and it also means that if another person is designed as a chamber-pot, his stench brings him no discrimination or judgment. we can't be judged for what's in us if the content is dependent upon the design.
besides, who's to say what's a flaw and what isn't...? after all, God has a vested interest in sin. how else do you explain how he shapes people's lives? joseph was sold into slavery by his brothers, then imprisoned on account of a woman's lust, all to become egypt's eventual vessel to God's salvation. without the sins of others, Joseph would have remained a mildly arogant daddys boy. it was God's plan for those sins to be comitted.
now, a couple examples from the arts, which, i'm told, reflect life on occasion.
the first is from my favorite cartoon movie (and originally a book i have yet to read, sadly...), The Iron Giant.
if you haven't seen it and want to, don't read this, i'll probably spoil the whole thing.
so, a giant robot falls from the sky. a kid finds him. he's got a bump on his head (not the kid), and a robot's equivalent of amnesia. the fbi sends someone to investigate. the kid hides the robot, gets to know him, teaches him about life, and discovers that, whatever else it may be, it's got the capacity to feel and love. eventually, however, he's found. the army attacks. the bump pops out, and the robot turns into the most lethal weapon imaginable. he starts attacking the army. the fbi guy (a complete egomaniac completely absorbed with destroying the robot) tells an offshore ship to fire a nuclear weapon. it will destroy not only the robot, but much of the kid's hometown. the robot flies into the sky and destroys the bomb in space before it gets there. he's decided he's not going to be a weapon, despite his design, he's going to be a saviour.
now let's look at the lord of the rings. gollum, in particular. he was obviously tormented from the very beginning by his jealous nature. falling prey to it also meant, in one case, falling prey to the power of the ring, which is more or less an amplifier of greed and power-lust. he is driven to hide, living forever, being further and further consumed by the ring, his nature becoming more and more aligned with the qualities of the ring. then one day, he loses it (or, the ring loses him, if you prefer, since it was always seeking a return to its master), and gollum is lost. ruined. through a strange combination of twists of fate, he ends up guiding frodo, the new ring-bearer, to mount doom, for the purposes of destroying the ring. he's conflicted, because he still very desperately wants the ring for himself. he fights the compulsion, however, and honestly becomes kind for a while, does a great service to the bearer in getting him into mordor. but his greatest service is yet to come. frodo, stradling the edge of the fiery crack of mount doom, poised to destroy once and for all the ring of power, can't bring himself to toss it in. and gollum, in his final act of absolute unthinking avarice, attacks frodo, biting off the finger on which the ring rests... and it falls into the fire, thus saving middle earth. gollum's disease, his unconquerable nature, saved the world.
so, redemption is found either way. without evil, nothing would have happened. the good parts and the evil parts all played their roles and altered the course of the future, and one without the other would have ceased to matter.
what i'm trying to say, i guess, is the same thing jesus said, but in a different way. the last shall be first and the first shall be last. that doesn't mean a role-reversal. that means that the last shall be equal to the first and the first shall be equal to the last. last and first will mean nothing. like the mountains being made plains and the valleys being raised up. everything balances, humanity included. that's why it's "believe and be saved", not "do and be saved". because we can't contravene the shape in which we were made, but we can trust that, at the end of the day, all of the vessels, no matter what the intention of their design, belong to the potter.